Quantcast
Channel: BetaArchive
Viewing all 61669 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Windows 1.0 Premiere Edition box real?

May 5, 2019, 4:19 am
$
0
0
In Forum: DOS to Windows 3.xx
By User: ComputerHunter

Hi, I found a picture of Windows 1.0 Premiere Edition on my hard drive. I don't have the source where I got it from (as always, yes I am spreading fakes... again).

https://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/2019-05/1557055033.th.89457.png

I want to know if it is real or fake as only one copy of Premiere Edition ever surfaced but the disks in my photo looks real.

I have nothing else to say because what ever that is from my hard drive and when ever when I ask something is real or not, I will get hundreds of questions. Look at it and please don't question me, I know nothing about this image but I suspect it was emailed to be by a friend.
↧
Search

Timeout Error

May 5, 2019, 5:44 am
↧
↧

Re: Windows 1.0 Premiere Edition box real?

May 5, 2019, 5:59 am
↧

Re: Timeout Error

May 5, 2019, 6:13 am
$
0
0
In Forum: Site Feedback and Support
By User: Edness

You mean the ECONNABORTED one? That just means you're disconnected from browsing the upload folder and you'll be immediately reconnected after going to a different folder, the actual file uploading is not interrupted by this.
↧

Re: Removing Timebomb in post-reset Longhorn builds

May 5, 2019, 7:23 am
$
0
0
In Forum: Windows Vista, 7, 8.x, 10
By User: Cosmo

Okay, I want to see build 5219.0. Sorry about my late reply. Cosmo, what other builds could you patch with that patcher?
I could try 5231, and see if it goes along smoothly.
↧
↧

Re: The Longhorn Kernel-Mode Timebomb

May 5, 2019, 7:40 am
$
0
0
In Forum: Windows Vista, 7, 8.x, 10
By User: Wheatley

I did actually have it trigger on a 4042 VMware VM back ages ago when I was discussing this exact thing with someone else. I ended up patching the kernel to remove the entire BSOD, which is pretty nuclear but it seemed to work.
↧

Re: Timeout Error

May 5, 2019, 10:22 am
$
0
0
In Forum: Site Feedback and Support
By User: MCpillager12

You mean the ECONNABORTED one? That just means you're disconnected from browsing the upload folder and you'll be immediately reconnected after going to a different folder, the actual file uploading is not interrupted by this.

I don't know what that is, but it's saying that the connection is timed out.
↧

Re: [BA FTP archive] Errata: Wrong version numbers, misnamin

May 5, 2019, 11:35 am
$
0
0
In Forum: Servers Discussion
By User: oscareczek

/(Abandonware) Operating Systems/PC/Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition/4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_de-de [Win98 Upgrade]
/(Abandonware) Operating Systems/PC/Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition/4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_en-us (Second Edition Updates)

I believe these two (except for language) are identical since 4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_de-de [Win3x Upgrade] exists, I suggest renaming the German one to match the English name.
↧
Search

Re: Timeout Error

May 5, 2019, 11:49 am
↧
↧

[REQUEST] Windows 95 and Microsoft Plus!

May 5, 2019, 12:15 pm
$
0
0
In Forum: Download Requests/Offers
By User: grommit2007

Does anyone have this version of Windows 95 OSR2 with Microsoft Plus! for Windows 95 on the same CD (0796 Part No. 000-45236 223249)?

https://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/2019-05/1557083212.th.74811.jpghttps://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/2019-05/1557083230.th.45441.jpg
↧

Re: OS/2 laptops?

May 5, 2019, 12:32 pm
$
0
0
In Forum: Other Operating Systems
By User: louisw3

Thinkpads for sure. But they were setup with DOS/Win in dualboot with the windows as the default.

There was no interactive menu, unlike NTLDR. So many people I knew with thinkpads didn't even know they had OS/2. I remember one person wanted me to help them to install it, to only find out that after they'd bought a copy of OS/2, it turned out that they already had it, pre-installed!

IBM divisions operate almost like independent companies. And the division that ran the PC's didn't care in the slightest about the OS/2 part.
↧

Re: [REQUEST] Windows 95 and Microsoft Plus!

May 5, 2019, 1:22 pm
↧

Re: [BA FTP archive] Errata: Wrong version numbers, misnamin

May 5, 2019, 1:56 pm
$
0
0
In Forum: Servers Discussion
By User: DonaltDuck

/(Abandonware) Operating Systems/PC/Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition/4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_de-de [Win98 Upgrade]
/(Abandonware) Operating Systems/PC/Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition/4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_en-us (Second Edition Updates)

I believe these two (except for language) are identical since 4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_de-de [Win3x Upgrade] exists, I suggest renaming the German one to match the English name.

just fix the tag name
extract setupx.dll from precopy2 and check the prodict-type give

4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_de-de [Win98 Upgrade]
--> [DEU] win98se_116_oem_cd_19990505 setupx.dll
new Tag 4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_de-de (OEM)

4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_en-us (Second Edition Updates)
--> [ENU] win98se_112_stepup_19990423 setupx.dll
new Tag 4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_en-us (StepUp)

4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_de-de [Win3x Upgrade]
--> [DEU] win98se_102_rtm_cd_19990505 setupx.dll
new Tag 4.10.2222a_x86fre_client_de-de (Upgrade)

type 100 ms-intern cd
type 101 rtl full cd
type 102 upgrade cd (win3x to 98SE)
type 110 select / VOL cd
type 111 msdn cd
type 112 stepup-98 cd (98FE to 98SE only)
type 115 oem cd
type 116 companion cd
type 120 oem cd (create with OPK-Kit)
↧
↧

Re: The Longhorn Kernel-Mode Timebomb

May 5, 2019, 2:05 pm
$
0
0
In Forum: Windows Vista, 7, 8.x, 10
By User: yourepicfailure

NT4 has a similar bugcheck that is tied to the kernel synchronizing its internal clock (with the CMOS clock, even though the generally more accurate system clock is also available).
[SNIP]
Maybe it's related, or not...
That may be sort of related with 4033, except controlled with a user-mode service. When I connect to any network with internet access I guess something synchronizes with a time server, setting a trip flag in winlogon killing every services controlled/started by winlogon. Shortly after, that kemode "crash" comes up. Since winlogon has ties with kernel mode, it is plausable it can trip it.
If I do not connect to a network, all is fine. Very intriguing.
And again I've never had it occur in a VM. Only a real pc.

>Wheatley
What vmware version may I ask? I use workstation 7.1 and I've never had it happen.

>Rexon
AFAIK, M3 builds do not posess the "enhanced" timebomb. TweakNT and the winlogon hack and you're good to go. Maybe even slap AntiWPA into the mix.
↧

Re: [BA FTP archive] Errata: Wrong version numbers, misnamin

May 5, 2019, 2:13 pm
$
0
0
In Forum: Servers Discussion
By User: oscareczek

I haven't said anything should be deleted, lol. However, it's nice you extracted these files, because it says German 98 update is (OEM).
↧
Search

Re: [REQUEST] Windows 95 and Microsoft Plus!

May 5, 2019, 2:45 pm
$
0
0
In Forum: Download Requests/Offers
By User: grommit2007

It may be this but it's not an original dump so can't be verified for sure.

That's Windows 95 OSR 2.1 with Plus. The one I'm looking for is Windows 95 OSR 2.0 with Plus.
↧

"TIMECRK.EXE is not a valid application" in Windows 95 Beta

May 5, 2019, 3:01 pm
$
0
0
In Forum: Windows 9x, ME
By User: SupernovaNick

I am trying to install Windows 95 Build 311 (January Test Release) in 86Box. The installation is successful, but when I try to use TIMECRK.EXE to remove the timebomb, I get this error:

https://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/2019-05/1557093539.or.65632.png

But I'm not on Windows NT???

This does not happen in builds like 122, 224, or 347.
Does anyone else get this problem? Is there a workaround for this?
Thanks.
↧
↧

Re: "TIMECRK.EXE is not a valid application" in Windows 95 B

May 5, 2019, 4:42 pm
$
0
0
In Forum: Windows 9x, ME
By User: SupernovaNick

It does something similar too in Build 405 (February Test Release):

https://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/2019-05/1557099611.or.94413.png

Is there something wrong with the monthly Test Release builds that causes TIMECRK to fail?

Also, if I run it with the MS-DOS prompt, the prompt will crash saying an illegal operation was attempted. If I run it from MS-DOS (boot disk or MS-DOS mode) then it will hang.
↧

Re: "TIMECRK.EXE is not a valid application" in Windows 95 B

May 5, 2019, 5:19 pm
↧

Re: Browsers that work with XP RTM / Longhorn

May 5, 2019, 8:07 pm
↧
Viewing all 61669 articles
Browse latest View live
Search